<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: we want the audience to talk more…?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unconference.net/we-want-the-audience-to-talk-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unconference.net/we-want-the-audience-to-talk-more/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 10:13:04 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay dedman</title>
		<link>http://www.unconference.net/we-want-the-audience-to-talk-more/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>jay dedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 01:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kaliyasblogs.net/unconference/?p=26#comment-28</guid>
		<description>good point. As one of the organizers of Vloggercon, I guess nothing can be perfect....

It&#039;s all what your definition of &quot;basic&quot; and &quot;advanced&quot;. For us, &quot;basic&quot; meant people who just videoblogged: wanting to learn how to edit better, etc.

&quot;advanced&quot; meant people wanting to go beyond just making a videoblog. ie teaching how to videoblog using Node101 resources, learning how to get involved with Network Neutrality in reference to videoblogging, IP issues.

I think &quot;unconference&quot; is such a generic word.
we are videobloggers and I believe our conference worked for videobloggers. Im not sure if there&#039;s a perfect format that works for any subject...then you lose the cool needs that each individual community has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good point. As one of the organizers of Vloggercon, I guess nothing can be perfect&#8230;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all what your definition of &#8220;basic&#8221; and &#8220;advanced&#8221;. For us, &#8220;basic&#8221; meant people who just videoblogged: wanting to learn how to edit better, etc.</p>
<p>&#8220;advanced&#8221; meant people wanting to go beyond just making a videoblog. ie teaching how to videoblog using Node101 resources, learning how to get involved with Network Neutrality in reference to videoblogging, IP issues.</p>
<p>I think &#8220;unconference&#8221; is such a generic word.<br />
we are videobloggers and I believe our conference worked for videobloggers. Im not sure if there&#8217;s a perfect format that works for any subject&#8230;then you lose the cool needs that each individual community has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BayTaper</title>
		<link>http://www.unconference.net/we-want-the-audience-to-talk-more/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>BayTaper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 04:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kaliyasblogs.net/unconference/?p=26#comment-27</guid>
		<description>This is an ingenious idea. I was at vLoggercon yesterday thinking some of these thoughts, &quot;how do I meet the best people to network with over such a short period of time?&quot; I still had a great and inpiring time at the event though, and I feel lucky it was held in my native city.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an ingenious idea. I was at vLoggercon yesterday thinking some of these thoughts, &#8220;how do I meet the best people to network with over such a short period of time?&#8221; I still had a great and inpiring time at the event though, and I feel lucky it was held in my native city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Sylvester</title>
		<link>http://www.unconference.net/we-want-the-audience-to-talk-more/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sylvester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 04:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kaliyasblogs.net/unconference/?p=26#comment-26</guid>
		<description>I am not sure how the &#039;high price&#039; tag gets associated with us so much - maybe the percived value is so great that people assume we are expensive. Nope. An introNetwork costs 5K to setup, host, be supported and ANYTHING else the client needs us to do to make it successful. That licensing fee is supplemented with a $1 per person charge. That is less than a cheap cuppa coffee.

Typically our clients get sponsors to underwrite the entire site, or turn on the ad engine and sell ads, so notonly does it pay for itself, it can generate much needed revenue for small conferences.

We do a lot of established conferences and think that we are ideal for unconferences.

give us a ring.

mark sylvester
ceo - co-founder</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure how the &#8216;high price&#8217; tag gets associated with us so much &#8211; maybe the percived value is so great that people assume we are expensive. Nope. An introNetwork costs 5K to setup, host, be supported and ANYTHING else the client needs us to do to make it successful. That licensing fee is supplemented with a $1 per person charge. That is less than a cheap cuppa coffee.</p>
<p>Typically our clients get sponsors to underwrite the entire site, or turn on the ad engine and sell ads, so notonly does it pay for itself, it can generate much needed revenue for small conferences.</p>
<p>We do a lot of established conferences and think that we are ideal for unconferences.</p>
<p>give us a ring.</p>
<p>mark sylvester<br />
ceo &#8211; co-founder</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

